In a triumph of perseverance and skill, Senior Associate Attorney Peter Steinau secured a Take Nothing finding in a post-termination orthopedic claim case. Despite a Chiropractic Panel QME indicating industrial injuries, Peter challenged the applicant’s credibility during the Trial.
Peter’s thorough cross-examination revealed inconsistencies between the medical records and the applicant’s claims. He brought forward strong evidence, such as proof of subsequent employment, emails about returning to work, and witness testimonies that contradicted the applicant’s claims about job duties and injury reporting before termination.
Ultimately, the Judge ruled in favor of Peter’s arguments, noting the applicant’s failure to meet the burden of proof and inconsistencies in their testimony. The applicant attorney’s attempt to challenge the decision through a Petition for Reconsideration was also rejected, leaving the Take Nothing intact.
Tagged in:
